Post by jabinkhatun908 on Feb 25, 2024 10:07:25 GMT
Choosing Venice and Amsterdam . While Working on the Social History of the Renaissance the Obvious Question Was Who Participated in the Movement or at Least Was Aware of It . I Thought That at Most It Must Be of the Population and I Began to Wonder What the Culture of the Was. That Led Me to Study Popular Culture. I Soon Realized That Italy Was Not the Right Setting It Was Either Too Broad Given the Importance of Regional Cultures or Too Narrow Since Folk Tales for Example Migrated Throughout Europe. Option From Galway to the Urals Remembering That My Fathers Family Was From Galway and.
That My Mothers Mother Came From Still Part of the Russian Empire. Precisely in That Book Popular Culture in Modern Europe Its Vocation to Develop at the Same Time a Total History in the Sense Marked by Fernand Braudel and at the Same Germany Mobile Number List Time to Account for a Series of Local and Particular Realities Which Could Be Linked to Something of What Later Became the Microhistory Promoted by Carlo Ginzburg for Whom You Made an Introduction to the English Edition of the Book on Piero Della Francesca . To What Extent Do You Feel Influenced by These Two Traditions and How Do You Value Today the Contributions Developed by Microhistory I See Macrohistory and Microhistory as Complementary Opposites.
I Am Attracted to the Big Picture but I Have Learned a Lot From the Early Microhistories Developed by Carlo Ginzburg Giovanni Levi Hans Medick and Emmanuel Le Roy Ladurie Among Others. I Believe That Later Microhistories Have Been Subject to the Law of Diminishing Intellectual Returns and That Some of Them Do Nothing More Than Tell Stories Found in the Archives While the Earlier Ones in Particular Were Partly Concerned With the Important Question of the Effect on the Interpretations of the History of a Change of Scale in This Sense I Recommend Reading the Book Game of Scales Edited by Jacques Reveil.
That My Mothers Mother Came From Still Part of the Russian Empire. Precisely in That Book Popular Culture in Modern Europe Its Vocation to Develop at the Same Time a Total History in the Sense Marked by Fernand Braudel and at the Same Germany Mobile Number List Time to Account for a Series of Local and Particular Realities Which Could Be Linked to Something of What Later Became the Microhistory Promoted by Carlo Ginzburg for Whom You Made an Introduction to the English Edition of the Book on Piero Della Francesca . To What Extent Do You Feel Influenced by These Two Traditions and How Do You Value Today the Contributions Developed by Microhistory I See Macrohistory and Microhistory as Complementary Opposites.
I Am Attracted to the Big Picture but I Have Learned a Lot From the Early Microhistories Developed by Carlo Ginzburg Giovanni Levi Hans Medick and Emmanuel Le Roy Ladurie Among Others. I Believe That Later Microhistories Have Been Subject to the Law of Diminishing Intellectual Returns and That Some of Them Do Nothing More Than Tell Stories Found in the Archives While the Earlier Ones in Particular Were Partly Concerned With the Important Question of the Effect on the Interpretations of the History of a Change of Scale in This Sense I Recommend Reading the Book Game of Scales Edited by Jacques Reveil.